Write What You Know

Authors Use Their Life Experience to Write Best-Selling Novels

John Grisham, Dick Francis, Jeff Stone and Sara Gruen are great examples for aspiring writers to "write what you know."

“Write what you know.” That advice is standard for aspiring writers. Nothing puts off a reader more than jarring errors; horse lovers who read “riding tackle” instead of “tack,” for instance, will quickly put the book down.

It doesn’t mean you can’t get creative with your writing, but if you tap into the hobby, career, or industry that you know and love, half your battle is won.

John Grisham was a trial lawyer when he wrote his first books. His second, The Firm, reached blockbuster status, and his career as a writer was set. Not only has Grisham’s experience as a lawyer made him at ease with the jargon, the ins and outs of courtroom procedure, and the behind-the-scenes happenings of a case, but his passion for justice has carried from the courtroom to the novel.

Dick Francis is known worldwide for his mysteries set in and around the world of racehorses. His first career was as a champion steeplechase jockey, riding in many of the races that appear in his books. His easy, casual intimacy with horses is what makes the stories ring true for other horse lovers.

Jeff Stone’s Five Ancestors series centers around medieval China, kung fu, and orphan children looking for their roots. Stone was adopted himself, succeeded in finding his birth mother, and is a black-belt kung fu practitioner. His knowledge of the Shaolin kung fu styles and his understanding of the need to know who you are make his books come alive for young readers.

Sara Gruen has a long relationship with animals: horses, cats, dogs, goats and more. Her first two books, Riding Lessons and Flying Changes, focused on horses, fear, and relationships. Her understanding and empathy for all animals carried her on to the best-selling Water for Elephants.

If you write a book about something you know well, does that mean you don’t have to do research? The answer is an emphatic No. Your story will undoubtedly go into areas you’re unfamiliar with, and you need to follow it there.

Dick Francis researched photography, wine, horse transport and many other topics to be able to tell his stories well. Sara Gruen did months of full-time research on circuses to be able to write Water for Elephants. Jeff Stone bought a python to get into the psyche of Snake. And John Grisham still has to research different injuries and corporate industries for the conflicts in his books.

So whether you’re an accountant, a veterinarian, or a real estate agent, use what you know to form the core of your novel. Then research what you need to flesh out the other areas.

Sources:

Writer Jennifer Jensen, J. Jensen

Jennifer Jensen - Jennifer Jensen is an Indiana writer just returned from a lovely few years in County Cork, Ireland. She has been the Feature Writer for ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 9+5?

Comments

Mar 31, 2008 3:31 PM
Kimberly Jensen :
I always thought once I was published it would be a piece of cake the second time around. Not so. I have found I have a little more confidence, but luck and timing still have a lot to do with it. I have been published twice in the "Chicken Soup for the Soul: Children with Special Needs," and had my first children's book published called, "Always the Elf." My first novel is now complete (middle grade reader) and in the mail to publishers. I'd love to hear your advice for second time around.
Apr 2, 2008 6:00 AM
Jennifer Jensen :
I looked up Always the Elf, and what I could see at the publisher's was delightful. Congratulations!

What you have to realize, though, is that you have two completely different types of publications, short essays and a picture book, and your middle-grade novel is in a different category as well. ANd it's a big enough difference that SCBWI has an award for someone making the genre switch. They're totally different forms.

So you have publication credits, but nothing really to get your foot in the door, unless the MG is also appropriate for Cedar Fort. The best I can tell you is to pretend you're starting at the beginning again. Your credits are a plus, but in the end the manuscript has to stand on its own. Research publishers, send it out again and again, and look at agents if you wnat. And then keep writing: practice writing, character sketches, starting the next book. And if this MG is still making the rounds when the next one is finished, so be it. If you have the determination to keep going, you'll make it. Good luck!
Jul 10, 2008 11:35 AM
Roshelle Garner :
I am an unpublished author. I guess I don't really even know where to start. Every one keeps telling me to write what I know but there are so many things. How do you just pick something?
Jul 17, 2008 3:47 AM
Elizabeth Watkin :
Writing what you know is good advice, however I don't think it should be taken at face value. Of course if you want to write something that needs to be realistic or accurate (like John Grisham and the like) then in a very practical sense this is vital.
However this advice is also guilty of encouraging a epidemic of autobiographical novels which are not always that great.
Writing what you know as a phrase needs to be analysed more carefully, what do we mean by know? This doesn't have to pertain to facts about one's experience, but an understanding or empathy enhanced by our own life experiences. There are plenty of wonderful writers who have written about what they know existentially rather than something they have experienced literally.(Italo Calvino, Orhan Parmuk)
Just because you have been a housewife for 20 years doesn't mean that's all you should write about, your talent as a writer takes this and makes something else from it.

A skilled writer uses what they know and transforms it into something that speaks to people and relates to the human condition. A skilled writers uses their own humanity to express a plot, a character, a narrative.
Jul 21, 2008 4:30 AM
Jennifer Jensen :
I agree that what we know socially and emotionally is very valid and will inform our writing. But I also remember cringing at a young adult book I read long ago, a light romance centered around horses. The author lost me in chapter two when she mentioned getting the horse's "riding tackle." Having grown up with horses, I know it's "tack" not "tackle," and it put me on edge for the rest of the story. There are many things, hobbies, professions and such, for which we know the language and idioms. They may seem mundane to us, but unusual/exotic to someone else. My background/life experience includes secretarial work, a radiation therapy office, horses, cross-stitch, and teaching piano lessons. My sister's includes Montana, truck driving, and being a medic in the first Gulf War. It doesn't mean we won't need to do research, but that the writing will be easier, more natural. And if you're writing about one area you know and interweave it with something else, PLEASE have a knowledgeable person read it and make corrections on language, situations and such. If the "riding tackle" author had done that, the story would have been much more credible.

As far as knowing many things and choosing something, the real story in any writing is about people. The "what you know" of the article pertains to the external plot and the setting, so think about the people, their quirks and personalities, and their interaction, and then let the problems evolve in a setting you're familiar with. You can always do the exotic setting (and the immense amount of research that goes with it) on your next book.
5 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement